Is A Journal Or Newsletter That Is Updated Frequently And Intended For The General Public.

Authored by Kit Knightly via Off-Guardian.org,

You asked for it, and so nosotros made it. A collection of all the arguments you lot'll ever demand.

Nosotros get a lot of e-mails and individual messages along these lines"practice y'all have a source for X?" or"can you lot point me to mask studies?" or"I know I saw a graph for bloodshed, merely I can't find it anymore". And we understand, it'southward been a long 18 months, and in that location are and then many statistics and numbers to endeavour and keep straight in your head.

And so, to deal with all these requests, we decided to brand a bullet-pointed and sourced list for all the key points. A one-stop-shop.

Hither are key facts and sources well-nigh the declared "pandemic", that volition help you get a grasp on what has happened to the world since January 2020, and assist you enlighten any of your friends who might be notwithstanding trapped in the New Normal fog: "Covid deaths" – Lockdowns – PCR Tests – "asymptomatic infection" – Ventilators – Masks – Vaccines – Deception & Foreknowledge

* * *

PART I: "COVID DEATHS" & Mortality

1. The survival rate of "Covid" is over 99%. Regime medical experts went out of their manner to underline, from the starting time of the pandemic, thatthe vast majority of the population are non in whatsoever danger from Covid.

About all studies on the infection-fatality ratio (IFR) of Covid have returned results between 0.04% and 0.5%. Pregnant Covid's survival rate is at least 99.5%.

2. There has been NO unusual excess mortality. The printing has called 2020 the Britain'due south "deadliest twelvemonth since world war two", merely this is misleading because it ignores the massive increase in the population since that fourth dimension. A more reasonable statistical measure out of mortality is Age-Standardised Mortality Rate (ASMR):

Past this measure, 2020 isn't fifty-fifty the worst yr for mortalitysince 2000, In fact since 1943just 9 years have been ameliorate than 2020.

Similarly, in the US the ASMR for 2020 is only at 2004 levels:

For a detailed breakdown of how Covid affected mortality beyond Western Europe and the US click here. What increases in bloodshed we have seen could be owing to non-Covid causes [facts 7, 9 & 19].

3. "Covid decease" counts are artificially inflated. Countries around the earth have been defining a "Covid expiry" as a"deathby any cause inside 28/30/60 days of a positive exam".

Healthcare officials from Italy, Germany, the Britain, US, Northern Ireland and others take all admitted to this practice:

Removing whatsoever distinction between dyingof Covid, and dying of something elseafter testing positive for Covid will naturally lead to over-counting of "Covid deaths". British pathologist Dr John Lee was warning of this "substantial over-estimate" equally early as last leap. Other mainstream sources accept reported information technology, too.

Because the huge percentage of "asymptomatic" Covid infections [fourteen], the well-known prevalence of serious comorbidities [fact 4] and the potential for false-positive tests [fact 18], this renders the Covid death numbers an extremely unreliable statistic.

4. The vast majority of covid deaths have serious comorbidities. In March 2020, the Italian government published statistics showing 99.ii% of their "Covid deaths" had at to the lowest degree one serious comorbidity.

These included cancer, heart disease, dementia, Alzheimer's, kidney failure and diabetes (amidst others). Over 50% of them hadthree or more serious pre-existing weather condition.

This pattern has held up in all other countries over the form of the "pandemic". An October 2020 FOIA asking to the UK's ONS revealed less than 10% of the official "Covid decease" count at that fourth dimension had Covid equally the sole cause of decease.

five. Average historic period of "Covid death" is greater than the average life expectancy. The average age of a "Covid death" in the UK is 82.5 years. In Italy it's 86. Frg, 83. Switzerland, 86. Canada, 86. The Us, 78, Australia, 82.

In about all cases the median age of a "Covid death"is higher than the national life expectancy.

As such, for near of the earth, the "pandemic" has had little-to-no impact on life expectancy. Dissimilarity this with the Spanish flu, which saw a 28% driblet in life expectancy in the United states of america in merely over a year. [source]

6. Covid mortality exactly mirrors the natural mortality curve. Statistical studies from the UK and India have shown that the curve for "Covid expiry" follows the curve for expected mortality almost exactly:

The risk of decease "from Covid" follows, nigh exactly, your background risk of death in general.

The small increase for some of the older age groups can be accounted for by other factors.[facts seven, 9 & 19]

7. At that place has been a massive increase in the use of "unlawful" DNRs. Watchdogs and government agencies take reported huge increases in the use of Do Not Resuscitate Orders (DNRs) over the last twenty months.

In the US, hospitals considered "universal DNRs" for any patient who tested positive for Covid, and whistleblowing nurses take admitted the DNR system was abused in New York.

In the UK there was an "unprecdented" rise in "illegal" DNRs for disabled people, GP surgeries sent out messages to non-terminal patients recommending they sign DNR orders, whilst other doctors signed "coating DNRs" forentire nursing homes.

A written report done by Sheffield Univerisity found over ane-third of all "suspected" Covid patients had a DNR fastened to their file inside 24 hours of infirmary admission.

Blanket utilize of coerced or illegal DNR orders could account for any increases in mortality in 2020/21.[Facts two & vi]

* * *

Function Two: LOCKDOWNS

8. Lockdowns do non prevent the spread of disease. There is little to no evidence lockdowns have whatsoever impact on limiting "Covid deaths". If you compare regions that locked downwards to regions that did non, you lot can encounter no pattern at all.

"Covid deaths" in Florida (no lockdown) vs California (lockdown)

"Covid deaths" in Sweden (no lockdown) vs UK (lockdown)

9. Lockdowns kill people. There is strong evidence that lockdowns – through social, economic and other public health impairment – are deadlier than the "virus".

Dr David Nabarro, World Wellness Organization special envoy for Covid-19 described lockdowns as a "global ending" in October 2020:

We inthe World Wellness Organization do not advocate lockdowns equally the primary ways of command of the virus[…] information technology seems nosotros may take a doubling of world poverty past next year. We may well take at least a doubling of kid malnutrition […] This is a terrible, ghastly global ending."

A UN report from Apr 2020 warned of 100,000s of children being killed past the economic bear upon of lockdowns, while tens of millions more than face possible poverty and famine.

Unemployment, poverty, suicide, alcoholism, drug use and other social/mental health crises are spiking all over the earth. While missed and delayed surgeries and screenings are going to run across increased bloodshed from heart disease, cancer et al. in the most future.

The touch on of lockdown would account for the small increases in excess bloodshed [Facts 2 & 6]

10. Hospitals were never unusually over-burdened. the primary argument used to defend lockdowns is that "flattening the curve" would prevent a rapid influx of cases and protect healthcare systems from collapse. Simply most healthcare systems were never close to collapse at all.

In March 2020 it was reported that hospitals in Espana and Italian republic were over-flowing with patients, simply this happens every flu season. In 2017 Spanish hospitals were at 200% capacity, and 2015 saw patients sleeping in corridors. A paper JAMA paper from March 2020 establish that Italian hospitals"typically run at 85-90% chapters in the winter months".

In the United kingdom, the NHS is regularly stretched to breaking point over the winter.

Equally part of their Covid policy, the NHS appear in Spring of 2020 that they would be"re-organizing hospital capacity in new ways to treat Covid and non-Covid patients separately" and that "as result hospitals volition feel chapters pressures at lower overall occupancy rates than would previously have been the instance."

This ways they removed thousands of beds. During an alleged deadly pandemic, they reduced the maximum occupancy of hospitals. Despite this, the NHS never felt pressure beyond your typical influenza flavour, and at times actually had 4x more empty beds than normal.

In both the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland and Us millions were spent on temporary emergency hospitals that were never used.

* * *

Part Three: PCR TESTS

11. PCR tests were non designed to diagnose disease. The Contrary-Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test is described in the media equally the "gold standard" for Covid diagnosis. Just the Nobel Prize-winning inventor of the process never intended information technology to be used equally a diagnostic tool, and said and so publicly:

PCR is just a process that allows you to make a whole lot of something out of something. It doesn't tell you that you are sick, or that the thing that y'all ended up with was going to injure you or anything like that."

12. PCR Tests have a history of being inaccurate and unreliable. The "golden standard" PCR tests for Covid are known to produce a lot of false-positive results, by reacting to DNA textile that is not specific to Sars-Cov-ii.

A Chinese study constitute the aforementioned patient could get two different results from the same test on the same twenty-four hours. In Deutschland, tests are known to have reacted to common cold viruses. A 2006 study found PCR tests for ane virus responded to other viruses too. In 2007, a reliance on PCR tests resulted in an "outbreak" of Whooping Coughing that never actually existed. Some tests in the US fifty-fifty reacted to the negative control sample.

The late President of Tanzania, John Magufuli, submitted samples goat, pawpaw and motor oil for PCR testing, all came dorsum positive for the virus.

As early as Feb of 2020 experts were admitting the test was unreliable. Dr Wang Cheng, president of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences told Chinese state television"The accuracy of the tests is only 30-l%". The Australian authorities's ain website claimed"There is limited evidence available to assess the accurateness and clinical utility of available COVID-19 tests." And a Portuguese courtroom ruled that PCR tests were"unreliable" and should not be used for diagnosis.

Yous tin can read detailed breakdowns of the failings of PCR tests here, hither and hither.

13. The CT values of the PCR tests are too loftier. PCR tests are run in cycles, the number of cycles y'all employ to get your result is known equally your "cycle threshold" or CT value. Kary Mullis said:"If you lot have to go more than xl cycles[…]there is something seriously wrong with your PCR."

The MIQE PCR guidelines concord, stating:"[CT] values higher than forty are doubtable considering of the implied low efficiency and generally should non exist reported," Dr Fauci himself even admitted annihilation over 35 cycles is nigh never culturable.

Dr Juliet Morrison, virologist at the University of California, Riverside, told the New York Times:Any test with a cycle threshold in a higher place 35 is besides sensitive…I'1000 shocked that people would remember that xl [cycles] could represent a positive…A more reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35″.

In the same commodity Dr Michael Mina, of the Harvard School of Public Health, said the limit should be 30, and the author goes on to betoken out that reducing the CT from 40 to thirty would accept reduced "covid cases" in some states by as much as ninety%.

The CDC's own data suggests no sample over 33 cycles could be cultured, and Germany's Robert Koch Institute says nothing over 30 cycles is probable to be infectious.

Despite this, it is known almost all the labs in the US are running their tests at to the lowest degree 37 cycles and sometimes equally high as 45. The NHS "standard operating procedure" for PCR tests rules fix the limit at twoscore cycles.

Based on what we know well-nigh the CT values, the majority of PCR test results are at best questionable.

xiv. The World Health Organization (Twice) Admitted PCR tests produced false positives.In Dec 2020 WHO put out a briefing memo on the PCR process instructing labs to be wary of high CT values causing simulated positive results:

when specimens return a loftier Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the stardom between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.

Then, in January 2021, the WHO released another memo, this time warning that "asymptomatic" positive PCR tests should be re-tested considering they might be false positives:

Where examination results practice not represent with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should exist taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.

15. The scientific footing for Covid tests is questionable. The genome of the Sars-Cov-ii virus was supposedly sequenced by Chinese scientists in Dec 2019, then published on Jan tenth 2020. Less than two weeks later, German language virologists (Christian Drosten et al.) had allegedly used the genome to create assays for PCR tests.

They wrote a newspaper,Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) past real-time RT-PCR, which was submitted for publication on January 21st 2020, and and then accustomed on January 22nd. Meaning the newspaper wasallegedly "peer-reviewed" in less than 24 hours. A process that typically takes weeks.

Since then, a consortium of over forty life scientists has petitioned for the withdrawal of the newspaper, writing a lengthy report detailing x major errors in the paper'south methodology.

They accept likewise requested the release of the journal's peer-review report, to prove the paper really did pass through the peer-review process. The journal has yet to comply.

The Corman-Drosten assays are the root of every Covid PCR test in the world. If the newspaper is questionable, every PCR test is too questionable.

* * *

Office IV: "ASYMPTOMATIC INFECTION"

sixteen. The majority of Covid infections are "asymptomatic". From equally early equally March 2020, studies done in Italian republic were suggesting l-75% of positive Covid tests had no symptoms. Another UK study from August 2020 plant equally much as 86% of "Covid patients"experienced no viral symptoms at all.

It is literally impossible to tell the departure between an "asymptomatic case" and a faux-positive test result.

17. There is very little testify supporting the alleged danger of "asymptomatic transmission". In June 2020, Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the WHO's emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, said:

From the information nosotros accept, it nonetheless seems to exist rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual,"

A meta-analysis of Covid studies, published by Periodical of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in Dec 2020, institute that asymptomatic carriers had a less than 1% chance of infecting people within their household. Some other report, done on influenza in 2009, found:

…limited testify to suggest the importance of [asymptomatic] transmission. The role of asymptomatic or presymptomatic influenza-infected individuals in illness transmission may have been overestimated…"

Given the known flaws of the PCR tests, many "asymptomatic cases" may exist false positives.[fact 14]

* * *

Part 5: VENTILATORS

xviii. Ventilation is Not a treatment for respiratory viruses. Mechanical ventilation is non, and never has been, recommended treatment for respiratory infection of whatever kind. In the early days of the pandemic, many doctors came forrad questioning the use of ventilators to care for "Covid".

Writing in The Spectator, Dr Matt Strauss stated:

Ventilators do not cure whatsoever disease. They can fill your lungs with air when you lot find yourself unable to practice so yourself. They are associated with lung diseases in the public's consciousness, but this is not in fact their most common or most appropriate application.

German Pulmonologist Dr Thomas Voshaar, chairman of Clan of Pneumatological Clinics said:

When we read the first studies and reports from China and Italian republic, nosotros immediately asked ourselves why intubation was and then common at that place.This contradicted our clinical experience with viral pneumonia.

Despite this, the WHO, CDC, ECDC and NHS all "recommended" Covid patients be ventilated instead of using non-invasive methods.

This was non a medical policy designed to best care for the patients, but rather to reduce the hypothetical spread of Covid by preventing patients from exhaling droplets aerosol.

xix. Ventilators killed people. Putting someone who is suffering from influenza, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or whatever other condition which restricts breathing or affects the lungs, will not alleviate any of those symptoms. In fact, it will almost certainly make it worse, and will kill many of them.

Intubation tubes are a source of potential a infection known as "ventilator-associated pneumonia", which studies bear witness affects up to 28% of all people put on ventilators, and kills 20-55% of those infected.

Mechanical ventilation is also dissentious to the physical structure of the lungs, resulting in "ventilator-induced lung injury", which can dramatically impact quality of life, and even consequence in death.

Experts judge 40-50% of ventilated patients die, regardless of their illness. Around the world, between 66 and 86% of all "Covid patients" put on ventilators died.

According to the "undercover nurse", ventilators were being used and then improperly in New York, they were destroying patients' lungs:

This policy was negligence at all-time, and potentially deliberate murder at worst. This misuse of ventilators could business relationship for whatever increase in mortality in 2020/21 [Facts 2 & 6]

* * *

Role Six: MASKS

20. Masks don't work. At least a dozen scientific studies take shown that masks do zippo to finish the spread of respiratory viruses.

Ane meta-analysis published past the CDC in May 2020 found"no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks".

Another study with over 8000 subjects plant masks"did non seem to exist effective against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections nor against clinical respiratory infection."

At that place are literally also many to quote them all, but you lot can read them: [ane][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][ten] Or read a summary by SPR here.

While some studies take been done claiming to evidence mask do work for Covid, they are all seriously flawed. 1 relied on cocky-reported surveys as information. Some other was and so badly designed a panel of experts demand it be withdrawn. A tertiary was withdrawn after its predictions proved entirely incorrect.

The WHO commissioned their own meta-analysis in the Lancet, just that study looked only at N95 masks and just in hospitals. [For full run down on the bad data in this study click here.]

Aside from scientific evidence, at that place'south plenty of real-earth prove that masks do zip to halt the spread of disease.

For instance, North Dakota and South Dakota had near-identical case figures, despite one having a mask-mandate and the other non:

In Kansas, counties without mask mandates actually had fewer Covid "cases" than countieswith mask mandates. And despite masks existence very common in Japan, they had their worst flu outbreak in decades in 2019.

21. Masks are bad for your health. Wearing a mask for long periods, wearing the same mask more than once, and other aspects of cloth masks tin can be bad for your health. A long study on the detrimental effects of mask-wearing was recently published by theInternational Periodical of Environmental Enquiry and Public Wellness

Dr. James Meehan reported in August 2020 he was seeing increases in bacterial pneumonia, fungal infections, facial rashes .

Masks are as well known to contain plastic microfibers, which damage the lungs when inhaled and may exist potentially carcinogenic.

Childen wearing masks encourages oral cavity-animate, which results in facial deformities.

People around the world have passed out due to CO2 poisoning while wearing their masks, and some children in China even suffered sudden cardiac arrest.

22. Masks are bad for the planet. Millions upon millions of disposable masks accept been used per month for over a year. A report from the UN plant the Covid19 pandemic will likely result in plastic waste material more than than doubling in the next few years., and the vast majority of that is face up masks.

The report goes on to warn these masks (and other medical waste) volition clog sewage and irrigation systems, which will have knock on furnishings on public health, irrigation and agronomics.

A study from the University of Swansea found"heavy metals and plastic fibres were released when throw-away masks were submerged in water." These materials are toxic to both people and wildlife.

* * *

Function VII: VACCINES

23. Covid "vaccines" are totally unprecedented. Before 2020 no successful vaccine against a human coronavirus had ever been developed. Since then we have allegedlyfabricated twenty of them in 18 months.

Scientists have been trying to develop a SARS and MERS vaccine for years with little success. Some of the failed SARS vaccines actually caused hypersensitivity to the SARS virus. Meaning that vaccinated mice could potentially get the afflictionmore than severely than unvaccinated mice. Another attempt acquired liver impairment in ferrets.

While traditional vaccines piece of work by exposing the trunk to a weakened strain of the microorganism responsible for causing the illness, these new Covid vaccines are mRNA vaccines.

mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) vaccines theoretically work by injecting viral mRNA into the torso, where it replicates inside your cells and encourages your body to recognise, and brand antigens for, the "spike proteins" of the virus. They have been the discipline of research since the 1990s, just before 2020 no mRNA vaccine was ever approved for use.

24. Vaccines do not confer immunity or prevent manual. Information technology is readily admitted that Covid "vaccines" donon confer immunity from infection and donot forbid you from passing the disease onto others. Indeed, an article in the British Medical Periodical highlighted that the vaccine studies were not designed to even endeavor and assess if the "vaccines" express transmission.

The vaccine manufacturers themselves, upon releasing the untested mRNA cistron therapies, were quite clear their product'southward "efficacy" was based on "reducing the severity of symptoms".

25. The vaccines were rushed and have unknown longterm furnishings.Vaccine development is a wearisome, laborious process. Usually, from evolution through testing and finally being approved for public apply takes many years. The diverse vaccines for Covid were all developed and approved in less than a year. Obviously there can be no long-term safety information on chemicals which are less than a yr sometime.

Pfizer even admit this is true in the leaked supply contract between the pharmaceutical giant, and the government of Republic of albania:

the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are non currently known

Farther, none of the vaccines have been subject to proper trials. Many of them skipped early-stage trials entirely, and the late-stage homo trials have either not been peer-reviewed, have not released their data, will non end until 2023 or were abandoned after "severe agin effects".

26. Vaccine manufacturers accept been granted legal indemnity should they cause impairment. The USA's Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP) grants amnesty until at least 2024.

The EU'due south product licensing police force does the aforementioned, and there are reports of confidential liability clauses in the contracts the European union signed with vaccine manufacturers.

The Britain went fifty-fifty further, granting permanent legal indemnity to the authorities, and whatsoever employees thereof, for any harm washed when a patient is being treated for Covid19 or "suspected Covid19".

Again, the leaked Albanian contract suggests that Pfizer, at to the lowest degree, made this indemnity a standard demand of supplying Covid vaccines:

Purchaser hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and concord harmless Pfizer […] from and confronting any and all suits, claims, deportment, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses

* * *

Function VIII: DECEPTION & FOREKNOWLEDGE

27. The European union was preparing "vaccine passports" at least a Twelvemonth before the pandemic began. Proposed COVID countermeasures, presented to the public as improvised emergency measures, have existed since earlier the emergence of the disease.

Two EU documents published in 2018, the"2018 State of Vaccine Confidence" and a technical report titled"Designing and implementing an immunisation information system" discussed the plausibility of an European union-wide vaccination monitoring system.

These documents were combined into the 2019 "Vaccination Roadmap", which (among other things) established a "feasibility study" on vaccine passports to begin in 2019 and finish in 2021:

This report'south final conclusions were released to the public in September 2019, simply a month before Result 201 (below).

28. A "training practise" predicted the pandemic just weeks earlier information technology started. In Oct 2019 the World Economical Forum and Johns Hopkins University held Result 201. This was a grooming practise based on a zoonotic coronavirus starting a worldwide pandemic. The exercise was sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI the vaccine alliance.

The exercise published its findings and recommendations in November 2019 as a "phone call to action". One calendar month later, China recorded their first case of "Covid".

29. Since the kickoff of 2020, the Flu has "disappeared". In the Us, since Februart 2020, influenza cases take allegedly dropped by over 98%.

It's not simply the Us either, globally influenza has apparently almost completely disappeared.

Meanwhile, a new disease called "Covid", which has identical symptoms and a like mortality rate to flu, is supposedly sweeping the globe.

30. The aristocracy have made fortunes during the pandemic. Since the beginning of lockdown the wealthiest people have become significantly wealthier. Forbes reported that xl new billionaires have been created "fighting the coronavirus", with 9 of them being vaccine manufacturers.

Business Insider reported that"billionaires saw their internet worth increase by half a trillion dollars" by October 2020.

Clearly that number volition be even bigger by now.

* * *

These are the vital facts of the pandemic, presented here every bit a resource to help codify and support your arguments with friends or strangers. Thanks to all the researchers who have collated and collected this information over the terminal 20 months, especially Swiss Policy Research.